Cynicism unlimited
Sol Salbe sent around the editorial from tomorrow’s Forward where we learn of ‘the recent discovery that the family of Anne Frank had unsuccessfully attempted to obtain an American visa before being captured by the Nazis’. In response, NY Democratic Rep. Steve Isr
“The best way we can honor Anne Frank in death is to give her what her father sought for her in life,” said
I was well aware that the
To their credit, the Forward recommends a more appropriate tribute to Anne Frank’s memory and in atonement for the wrong done her, the
What has the administration done to address the crisis? From 2003 until last month, the
The administration has taken a few key steps in recent weeks, which suggests that it is finally ready to set a new, morally responsible course on the issue. Earlier this month, the State Department announced the creation of a task force to coordinate American efforts to resettle and assist Iraqi refugees. Then, last week, administration officials unveiled a plan to admit about 7,000 of the refugees into this country by the end of the year.
As Senator Arlen Specter recently pointed out during a hearing on Capitol Hill, last year 20,000 of the immigration slots reserved for refugees went unused. The issue, according the State Department official on the other end of Specter’s grilling, was a matter of dollars and cents: Financing for the slots was not available.
The Forward reckons the 7000 is ‘progress’ in comparison to their previous ‘shameful record’. Apparently, these refugees ‘have no future back in their native country because of their support for
What’s missing from the Forward’s editorial is the obvious first step that the
In response, NY Democratic Rep. Steve Israel proposes that Anne Frank be awarded posthumous honourary American citizenship!
ReplyDeleteThe complete lack of any understanding is rather sad.
In Canada there was a lot of guilt over the treatment of Jews - especially the Luciatania. The result was about 2 decades of liberalised refugee laws. Those days are unfortunately long over.
"The US should definitely fly all 4 million over and educate, house, and employ the lot."
ReplyDeleteeh........
It *is* a destruction effort, mind you....
Lets just say that the type of folk who you know...work with an occupier..aren't too popular nowadays with a war on and whatnot...you know if they aren't flat out inflitrators, then whatever they already turned once, what's twice?
Not to mention it's widely understood that the point of the war on terror is to bombard muslims.
So how about the UK, you want to take them?,it would probably help RESPECT among other socialist movements..
Oh,disclaimer: The actual point of the war on terror is commercial, the understood one regards bombarding muslims.
ReplyDelete