The promise
Anybody who's read this blog will know
that I tend to be highly critical of anything I see about Palestine.
While my principal concern seems to be deconstructing hasbara
'arguments', bogus 'definitions' of antisemitism
and so forth, I have also criticised the Two State 'Solution™,
expressed scepticism of the one and no state solutions, and cast
doubt on BDS. So it's a big deal when I find something that offers so
little to criticise as Peter Kosminsky's 2011 four part Channel Four
series, The promise.
I gather from Cecilie Surasky's 22 February Muzzlewatchhttp://www.muzzlewatch.com/2013/02/22/british-mandate-mini-series-the-promise-not-showing-in-ontario/#sthash.qUqJMedE.dpuf
post (which ironically has the comments facility disabled) that many
in North America have not seen this important series. To the best of
my knowledge, it has never been broadcast either free to air or on
cable in the US or Canada and the DVD only appears to be available
coded for regions 2 and 4, but you know what to do about that, and
there are torrents available, as well. I recommend that you make a
point of securing a copy and a box of tissues and read no further, as
there will be a few spoilers.
The
story begins in 2005 when Erin, an English girl who has just finished
school, and her mother, Chris, visit her grandfather, Len, in
hospital. He is intubated and can't speak or move. In the next scene,
Erin and Chris are clearing out Len's house and Erin discovers his
diary hidden behind some other books. She asks Chris about it and is
instructed to 'bin it', as 'it's private', which is sufficient to
ensure that Erin recovers it from the trash and takes it. She then
divulges that her closest mate, Eliza, an Israeli dual national who
has done her schooling in England – her father is an English oleh,
has to return to do her military service and has asked Erin to come
with her. Furthermore, she is leaving in a few days' time. Eliza's
motivation is not really clear. She will be in training five days of
the week, leaving Erin to lounge by the pool at her parents'
luxurious Caesaria house and hang with her at the weekend. On the
flight, Eliza dozes in her first class seat while Erin starts reading
the diary, depicted in flashbacks, in which she learns that Len had
served in the force that liberated the Bergen-Belsen concentration
camp. The flashback includes a few minutes of gruesome holocaust
footage.
The
balance of the series follows Len's experiences in Palestine after
the war interspersed with Erin's adventures as she attempts to find
the family of Mohammed abu Hassan, the chaiwallah employed by Len's
unit who Len had befriended. Erin is utterly clueless and quite aware
of her cluelessness. Although Claire Foy, the actress who plays her,
was in her mid 20s when the series was filmed, she appears even
younger than her character's 18 years. She wanders into situations
that she knows must be dangerous without a qualm and never hesitates
to request extravagant favours from people she doesn't know that will
on occasion place them in mortal peril. Indeed, the fate of Omar, an
Israeli Palestinian, veteran of the Al Aqsa Martyrs Brigade and
fellow member of Combatants for Peace with Eliza's elder brother,
Paul, is left unresolved. Presumably to keep Len's and Erin's
narratives in parallel, Erin does not finish reading the diary before
she sets out on her adventures. Or perhaps that's just an indication
of how unprepared she was.
My
principal criticism of the series is that, consistent with the
narrator's point of view, it is couched entirely within the trope of
the beneficent British army's valiant attempt to keep the colonised
Jews and Arabs from tearing each other apart – 'the meat in the
sandwich', as the intelligence officer puts it in a briefing. Len,
himself, a sergeant in command of some 40 other soldiers, is
scrupulously fair to everybody, but then it is
his diary. And as a matter of fact, it's not really a criticism. One
of the charms of the series, the usual accusations of antisemitism
notwithstanding, is that it airs a healthy range of perspectives. Len
has an affair with Clara, a Holocaust survivor employed by the Haifa
City club to entertain British troops (an institution, by the way,
that I had been unaware of), who is also a member of the Irgun. Erin
meets Eliza and Paul's maternal grandfather, another Irgun terrorist
enjoying what appears to be a decidedly comfortable retirement, who
is proud of his involvement in the July 1946 bombing of the King
David Hotel where the mandate authorities were headquartered, which
killed 91, including 17 Jews. Coincidentally, Len has a meeting there
and arrives just in time to witness the attack, but is not badly
injured. Len often hears radio broadcasts by the Jewish resistance.
Paul and Eliza's father articulates traditional 'liberal Zionist'
views, while Paul himself, who served for three years in Hebron, is
antizionist and seldom enunciates anything I'd differ with. In the
course of her travels, Omar takes Erin to Ein Hawd, where survivors
of the Nakba get to tell their stories.
Through
plot devices that sometimes seem a little contrived, Len's story
takes the viewer through a number of historical incidents, including
the King David Hotel bombing and the Deir Yassin massacre, while Erin
survives a suicide bombing in a Tel Aviv bar, witnesses the
harassment of schoolchildren and others in Hebron and a house
demolition in Gaza.
There
are a few apparent inconsistencies and anachronisms. In the first
episode, for instance, Eliza drives herself and Erin, alone in the
family's Mercedes convertible, to her first day of training. It is
not clear how she aims to return the car to her home when Erin, who
we already know to be epileptic, can't drive. When Len is patrolling
one night in 1945 or 1946, he uses a torch that looks suspiciously
like a Maglite, which was only invented in 1979. Observant viewers
familiar with military paraphernalia can probably spot other such
anachronisms. Perhaps most disturbingly, in the final episode, Omar
and Erin enter Gaza through a tunnel. As far as I know, the tunnels
into the Gaza strip connect Rafah with the Egyptian side of the
border. It seems inconceivable that a tunnel entrance within Israel
could go undetected. But there's no indication that they flew or
snuck into Egypt to access the tunnel.
Quibbling
aside, I think The
promise
provides a dramatic and easily digested introduction to some of the
historical events and current issues in Palestine and I make a point of
showing it to whoever will sit still for six hours.
Hi Ernie
ReplyDeleteI meant to comment on this ages ago but didn't get round to it.
Re your point that "As far as I know, the tunnels into the Gaza strip connect Rafah with the Egyptian side of the border. It seems inconceivable that a tunnel entrance within Israel could go undetected. But there's no indication that they flew or snuck into Egypt to access the tunnel." Kosminsky had an audience q and a about The Promise and he was challenged about that same point and responded to the effect that the assumption that the tunnel was between Gaza and Israel could be wrong. But he also said that tunnels by their nature are secret so we can't know whether there are tunnels between Israel and Gaza. I've posted the clip here: http://jewssansfrontieres.blogspot.co.uk/2011/06/kosminsky-and-critics.html
I also did a post making the same point about contriving Len into the major events of the zionist conquest of Palestine. I, possibly cruelly, likened it to Forrest Gump.
http://jewssansfrontieres.blogspot.co.uk/2011/06/late-take-on-kosminskys-promise.html
But it was a great primer for those who don't know the history.
Nice to see you here, levi, thanks for your comment. Far be it from me to take anyone to task for procrastinating;~}
ReplyDeleteI'm sure I saw your original post. In fact that might have been what prompted me to track it down in the first place. But I didn't watch the video of Kosminsky, probably because at that time, playing videos crashed my computer - turned out to be a bodgy power supply unit. Sorted now.
Having now watched it, I'm mildly embarrassed to have described the tunnels in exactly the same terms as that Zionist shill in the audience. That said, Kosminsky's rejoinder was decidedly unsatisfying - 'How do you know the tunnel was from Israel?' 'Tunnels are secret by nature'. The reason we know the tunnel was not from Egypt is that that would mean that there was a big hole in the narrative showing how Omar and Erin got there, which would not have been a straightforward process for an 'Israeli Arab'. As for the secrecy of a tunnel inside Israel, it is profoundly implausible that people and goods entering and leaving the house on the Israeli side would go unnoticed. 'Inconceivable' may have put it a little too strongly, but not much. Unlike the shill, however, I wouldn't claim that my thinking it inconceivable constitutes some kind of historical 'proof'.
It turns out that a tunnel from Gaza into Israel is more than just conceivable: '"This tunnel penetrates into the state of Israel 300-400 meters from the border with the Gaza Strip"...the tunnel was equipped with railway tracks and lighting' http://www.maannews.net/eng/ViewDetails.aspx?ID=638541
ReplyDelete