Writing in today’s NY Times, Jim Rutenberg reports,
Now that President Bush is seeking “a new way forward” in
The latest shift in the official language of the war is begging the question: Well, which is it? A tie? A draw? Something else?
Well might he ask. But more to the point, in the entire 630 word article, he never gets to the real point – who are ‘we’ and what would it mean to win?
Of course it goes without saying that ‘we’ are the
It doesn’t really matter that he doesn’t tell us what winning would entail, because his colleague Sheryl Gay Stolberg quotes the decider on exactly this in another article.
A free and democratic
So if ‘victory in